Articles
5 August 2021

3D printing is a threat to world trade but its impact is still limited

The share of 3D printed goods in global manufacturing could rise to 5% over the next two decades. That is a significant increase from the current share of 0.1%, but much lower than in the two scenarios in our 2017 report. The effect on world trade is more subdued as well, at -4.5%. This implies, on average, 0.2 percentage points less trade growth per year

The re-bundling of the production process

3D printing can hurt world trade in two ways. Firstly, 3D printing usually means the re-bundling of production phases, because 3D printers can make the (intermediate) product as a whole. So it shortens the supply chain leading to less trade in intermediates. And as far as 3D printing is part of a strategy to produce closer to the customer - given the rising popularity of local for local - it leads to less cross border trade as well.

The re-bundling of the production processes does not in all cases lead to proportionally less trade

Economically, 3D printing is mainly used as a production method for customised or complex-shaped products. Experience shows that it is not a given that all customised 3D printed products are made close to the consumer. In an interesting Worldbank study, Freund et al (2018), showed that in the case of hearing devices and dental crowns, 3D printing has not led to localisation as production only takes place in a few countries.

According to this research, the lack of skilled labour in many countries is an important reason that the production of, for example, hearing devices isn't done in the countries where they're used. The thought that with the arrival of relatively cheap and small 3D desktop printers, dentists would all start printing crowns themselves, has not materialised. At least not yet. So the re-bundling of the production processes does not in all cases lead to proportionally less trade.

Customisation is a key part of 3D printed products

Secondly, hearing aids and dental crowns are customised products. Customisation usually gives the supplier of the product pricing power, meaning they can more easily pass on the costs of, for example, transport to the buyer.

A third reason why the cost of transport has apparently not been prohibitive for centralising production in a few countries is that the likes of hearing aids and dental crowns are light and small. That makes them relatively cheap to transport.

A product's size is more important than its weight when gauging the effect of 3D printed products on trade and transport

Of course, not all 3D printed products are light and small. 3D printing is, for example, used a lot for making metal products. But since roughly three-quarters of all exported products are transported by container ships and the costs of that are foremost determined by the size of the product, weight is less important.

Knowing that many 3D printed goods are customised goods and those which are usually of the size between a marble and a football, transport costs are often not decisive when choices are made regarding the location of production of three printed goods. In other words, it seems plausible to assume that transport costs are less determinative for the profit margin of 3D printed products than for those produced en mass.

This means that the substitution of traditional production methods by 3D printers probably does not always translate into bringing production closer to the consumer. So it also doesn’t translate into less trade and transport.

shutterstock_editorial_12215401b.jpg
This 3D printed pedestrian bridge, recently opened in Amsterdam, shows that the technology is well-suited to making complex shapes

Earlier, we stated that, although we recognise that forecasting the speed of the technological improvements of 3D printing is very hard and perhaps not a task for economists. But we feel comfortable with a rise in the market share of 3D printing, in total manufacturing, to about 5% in the long run. Calculations show that, given a slight increase in the growth rate of the 3D printing business, this share can be reached by around 2040.

A manufacturing share of 5% for 3D printed products by 2040 would have a permanent downward effect on the size of world trade of around 4.5 percentage points of global trade. That is if all printed goods were to be made close to the consumer. But keeping the experiences of dental aids and hearing devices in mind, the effect of switching to 3D printing on world trade will be somewhat lower, around 3% to 4% for goods. Taking into account the part of traded services that are linked to the goods trade, the damage to trade adds up to 4.5%

Concluding remarks

Currently, 3D printing is economically not competitive for producing uniform products en mass such as rubbish bags, bottles, plugs and so on. As long as this is the case, 3D printing will not lead to large changes in the complex cross border value chains that currently characterise the way mass products are made. Of course, further technological developments in 3D printers can change that, but industry experts don’t expect this to happen anytime soon.

3D printing is economically not competitive for mass production

This means that 3D printed goods will in the short run consist mostly of customised and complex-shaped products made as one-offs or in a series of relatively low quantities

This doesn’t mean however that there is little room for growth of the 3D business. In line with some industry experts, we expect that the number of applications will expand as machine, material, and operational costs are driven downward and customised products become more popular. We also think that the adoption of this technology will accelerate because the threshold fear is diminishing since 3D printing has proved its usefulness in a wide range of markets during the pandemic.

We expect that the share of 3D printing in global manufacturing could well rise to 5% over the next two decades. This will have a downward influence on the growth of cross border trade and transport. But the effect will be less than proportional because transport costs are financially less important for customised products than for standardised ones. This makes us believe that the downward effect on trade and transport will be less than 5%, around 3 to 4%.


Disclaimer

"THINK Outside" is a collection of specially commissioned content from third-party sources, such as economic think-tanks and academic institutions, that ING deems reliable and from non-research departments within ING. ING Bank N.V. ("ING") uses these sources to expand the range of opinions you can find on the THINK website. Some of these sources are not the property of or managed by ING, and therefore ING cannot always guarantee the correctness, completeness, actuality and quality of such sources, nor the availability at any given time of the data and information provided, and ING cannot accept any liability in this respect, insofar as this is permissible pursuant to the applicable laws and regulations.

This publication does not necessarily reflect the ING house view. This publication has been prepared solely for information purposes without regard to any particular user's investment objectives, financial situation, or means. The information in the publication is not an investment recommendation and it is not investment, legal or tax advice or an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell any financial instrument. Reasonable care has been taken to ensure that this publication is not untrue or misleading when published, but ING does not represent that it is accurate or complete. ING does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss arising from any use of this publication. Unless otherwise stated, any views, forecasts, or estimates are solely those of the author(s), as of the date of the publication and are subject to change without notice.

The distribution of this publication may be restricted by law or regulation in different jurisdictions and persons into whose possession this publication comes should inform themselves about, and observe, such restrictions.

Copyright and database rights protection exists in this report and it may not be reproduced, distributed or published by any person for any purpose without the prior express consent of ING. All rights are reserved.

ING Bank N.V. is authorised by the Dutch Central Bank and supervised by the European Central Bank (ECB), the Dutch Central Bank (DNB) and the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM). ING Bank N.V. is incorporated in the Netherlands (Trade Register no. 33031431 Amsterdam).