Russia
Russian budget: modest deficit leaves fiscal room for 2021
In 2020, Russia managed to limit the federal deficit at 3.8% of GDP, thanks to better-than-expected revenue collection, one-off proceeds of 1.0% of GDP and a persistent spending backlog of 1.0% of GDP. The latter might be powered through in 2021, most likely in favour of social support ahead of the parliamentary elections
The Russian finance ministry reported its preliminary estimate of the federal budget deficit for 2020 at RUB4.1tr, or 3.8% GDP, which is smaller than the RUB4.6tr (4.2% of GDP) deficit we anticipated due to better-than-expected revenue collection and lower-than-expected spending. Here are the key observations and takeaways:
- The 5.6 percentage point deterioration of the federal budget balance from a 1.8% GDP surplus in 2019 to a 3.8% GDP deficit in 2020 has been limited both on the expenditure and revenue sides. First, federal spending went up by 4.8ppt of GDP (with two-thirds of the sum targeted toward social support, healthcare, and transfers to the regional budgets), but the 1.0% GDP spending backlog (80% of it represented by spending allocations for the functioning of the government, police, military, and direct suport to industries) accumulated from the previous years, remained unchanged. Second, non-fuel revenues, despite the likely 3% GDP drop, remained flat in nominal terms and increased by 0.5ppt in real terms. The revenue side was also supported by 1.0% GDP one-off proceeds from the Sberbank equity stake transaction.
- Only the fuel revenue side showed a 2.3ppt deterioration amid the US$23/bbl drop in average Urals price and a decline in output volumes. Annual fuel revenues per US$1/bbl of Urals price dropped from US$1.9bn in 2019 to US$1.7bn in 2020, the lowest level since 2016.
- Budget breakeven oil price went up from US$48/bbl in 2019 to US$74/bbl, also a post-2016 high, but still slightly lower than the US$80/bbl level we anticipated. The spike is driven purely by the increase in expenditure and is the primary reason why the finance ministry is guiding for consolidation in 2021-23. We maintain, that the weak household income trend and accelerating CPI ahead of September's Parliamentary elections may become a strong argument in favor of powering through the 1.0% GDP spending backlog and redistributing it in favour of social and regional support. This would allow to avoid a 6% nominal cut in federal expenditures drafted for 2021, while not requiring additional borrowing (we understand that the funds allocated for the backlog are saved on the Treasury accounts).
- Financing of the deficit in 2020 relied heavily on local borrowing, which totaled net RUB4.6tr (exceeding the headline deficit). This has increased the dependence of the local money market on the Minfin's liquidity provision instruments. As of the end of November last year, local banks' liabilities to the Minfin through deposits and repo operations stood at RUB6.2tr, being up RUB0.6tr year-on-year. However, in December 2020 and January 2021, the Minfin has apparently reduced its liquidity provision by at least RUB1.5tr, putting pressure on the money market. This year's net debt placement programme of RUB2.7tr does not exceed the expected deficit, and we do not exclude that amid the suspended fiscal rule it might be further reduced depending on the market appetite for state local bonds and Urals price performance. The total public debt is likely to stabilize around 20-21% GDP level, which is still low by global standards.
- The official budget for 2021 is drafted under assumption of US$45.3/bbl average Urals price, which suggests some room for outperformance. Under ING's house view, we see around RUB0.8tr of extra fuel revenues this year to be deposited in the sovereign wealth fund (National Wealth Fund) or partially used to finance current spending amid the suspended fiscal rule.
- Assuming the likely outperformance of both Urals price and spending volumes vs. the official draft, we expect a 1.8-2.0% GDP (RUB2.1-2.3tr) deficit this year, with borrowing volumes not exceeding these amounts. To remind, the regional budget balance will be another factor to watch starting this year given the possibility of lower dependence on federal transfers in financing the deficits.