Hungary: Will Fitch follow S&P’s lead?

After S&P’s sovereign ratings upgrade last week, Fitch Ratings’ decision will come this Friday (22 February). We see a strong chance of a second upgrade, with most of the criteria having been met

Opinions
20 February 2019
Budapest-Hungary
Shutterstock
BBB-

Sovereign debt rating (Fitch)

Outlook: Positive

The background

Just one week after S&P, this Friday (22 February) Fitch Ratings has the opportunity to review its Hungarian sovereign ratings. Of the three major rating agencies, in 2016 Fitch was the first to upgrade Hungary from ‘junk’ (non-investment grade) to ‘BBB-‘. It changed its outlook from "stable" to "positive" in November 2017. Almost one-and-a-half years have passed since then, with a lot of improvement in our view. We are optimistic on the upcoming ratings review.

Arguments for

In its latest press release (August 2018), Fitch highlighted that Hungary needs to maintain its positive current account balance to earn an upgrade. Despite its recent deterioration due to high domestic demand, we expect the C/A balance to remain in positive territory (helped by newly built export capacities) for the foreseeable future, and putting Hungary above the average (negative) balances of ‘BBB’ countries. A decline in the government debt-to-GDP ratio also needs to be sustained. With this falling to a lower-than-expected 70.9% in 2018, we see this criteria as having been fulfilled. The deficit-to-GDP ratio (2.2% of GDP) came in lower than planned for by the government. Another important factor in an upgrade would be the strengthening of potential GDP growth and an improvement in the business environment. High statistical and methodological uncertainty means we don’t want to argue with the rating agency in this regard, but still see potential Hungarian growth well above the 2% calculated by Fitch. 2018 GDP growth came in at 4.8%, its highest since the beginning of official data disclosure. Last but not least, the latest move by S&P also favours Hungary’s case for an upgrade.

Argument against

Fitch pointed out in August 2018 that fiscal policy is pro-cyclical. This can lead to a deteriorating fiscal environment in the long run. We do not necessarily share this view and see the fiscal policy stance as neutral - our disagreement stemming from the calculation of potential GDP. However, we can see Fitch maintaining this argument against a Hungarian rating upgrade. Another common concern among rating agencies is the relatively high government debt level (twice as high as in ‘BBB’ countries), something which still holds despite the ongoing fall in public debt ratios. Since the latest Fitch review, the EU has voted to trigger the Article 7 sanctions procedure, but so far this hasn’t led to any apparent fiscal or economic consequences. Despite talks about a new tool whereby member states that jeopardise the rule of law risk losing EU funds, we haven’t seen much progress on this.

Based on market pricing, Hungary should have a better rating than 'BBB-'

Source: Bloomberg, ING
Bloomberg, ING

Our expectation

All things considered, we see the pros dominating the debate and so a good chance that Fitch will upgrade Hungary to ‘BBB’. A simple affirmation of the rating cannot be excluded. With Hungary’s 'junk’ rating long gone, and based on CDS pricing which shows investors treating Hungary as a ‘BBB+’-country anyway, we don’t expect any major market move in the aftermath of this decision.

Fitch Ratings Moody's S&P
22 February 03 May 15 February
16 August 25 October 16 August
Peter Virovacz

Peter Virovacz

Senior Economist, Hungary

Peter Virovacz is a Senior Economist in Hungary, joining ING in 2016. Prior to that, he has worked at Szazadveg Economic Research Institute and the Fiscal Council of Hungary. Peter studied at the Corvinus University of Budapest.

Content Disclaimer
This publication has been prepared by ING solely for information purposes irrespective of a particular user's means, financial situation or investment objectives. The information does not constitute investment recommendation, and nor is it investment, legal or tax advice or an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell any financial instrument. Read more