How to create a sustainable portfolio
Sustainable investment strategies are as varied and diverse as opinions on the subject matter itself. In the second part of our series, we take a deep dive into some of the most popular approaches
Everyone interprets sustainability in a slightly different way. And this diversity of opinion has found its way into the world of asset management, where a host of different strategies are employed to create 'sustainable' portfolios, some of which are used in combination.
The fact that there is no single approach has benefits to both consumers and companies:
- First, consumers have many options and can choose a strategy that best fits their own definition of sustainability.
- Second, the fact that there is no firm definition makes it easier for a company to evolve towards a more sustainable company. A one-size-fits-all definition could exclude a number of worthy companies and make it more difficult for them to achieve their sustainability goals.
Here are some key strategies that are used in sustainable investing:
Exclusion
An investor can choose to exclude certain companies or countries in his portfolio. This can be done for specific companies such as one that does not respect human rights, but also for entire industries such as tobacco or gaming. In countries where such considerations are already a legal requirement, exclusion can become an obligation. In Belgium, for example, it is forbidden to invest in or finance companies involved in the sale or use of controversial weapons such as cluster bombs or depleted uranium weapons.
Best-in-Class
The "best-in-class" principle selects assets with the best Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) performance compared to others in the sector. It can be applied on the basis of the ESG score or on the basis of a change in the ESG score over time. What this means is that no company or country is excluded. Investing in a polluting company is therefore possible as long as it has the best ESG score within its sector.
Active ownership
Shareholders can enter into a dialogue with a company to influence company decisions on ESG issues. They can use their voting rights or ask questions during the general meeting. This strategy is in stark contrast to selling or not buying investments with dubious practices, such as exclusion.
Thematic investing
Through this strategy an investor can focus on certain trends. Some of these trends are related to ESG, such as clean technology, green real estate or healthcare, and so this can also be categorised as sustainable investing.
Impact investing
Impact investors want to have an impact on social and environmental issues. They draw up clear social and environmental objectives and are committed to measuring and reporting these. The target for the financial return generally varies from retaining capital to the risk-adjusted market return.
ESG integration
In this strategy, ESG risks and opportunities are systematically included in the investment analysis. It's not necessary to set criteria to exclude certain companies, sectors or countries (as in exclusion). Nor is it necessary to add companies that score relatively better on ESG issues (such as best-in-class). Users of this strategy are aware that ESG issues entail risks and they can decide not to take them. Of course, ESG also offers opportunities and an ESG analysis can help to identify them.
So we can use the above strategies to invest in a sustainable way. Doing this is obviously a good idea for society as investing in sustainable companies improves their financing conditions and this, in turn, makes it easier for these companies to achieve their goals. But what about the financial return for investors? Well, we can be optimistic.
Read the next article in this series: Is Sustainability Good for my Wallet?
"THINK Outside" is a collection of specially commissioned content from third-party sources, such as economic think-tanks and academic institutions, that ING deems reliable and from non-research departments within ING. ING Bank N.V. ("ING") uses these sources to expand the range of opinions you can find on the THINK website. Some of these sources are not the property of or managed by ING, and therefore ING cannot always guarantee the correctness, completeness, actuality and quality of such sources, nor the availability at any given time of the data and information provided, and ING cannot accept any liability in this respect, insofar as this is permissible pursuant to the applicable laws and regulations.
This publication does not necessarily reflect the ING house view. This publication has been prepared solely for information purposes without regard to any particular user's investment objectives, financial situation, or means. The information in the publication is not an investment recommendation and it is not investment, legal or tax advice or an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell any financial instrument. Reasonable care has been taken to ensure that this publication is not untrue or misleading when published, but ING does not represent that it is accurate or complete. ING does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss arising from any use of this publication. Unless otherwise stated, any views, forecasts, or estimates are solely those of the author(s), as of the date of the publication and are subject to change without notice.
The distribution of this publication may be restricted by law or regulation in different jurisdictions and persons into whose possession this publication comes should inform themselves about, and observe, such restrictions.
Copyright and database rights protection exists in this report and it may not be reproduced, distributed or published by any person for any purpose without the prior express consent of ING. All rights are reserved.
ING Bank N.V. is authorised by the Dutch Central Bank and supervised by the European Central Bank (ECB), the Dutch Central Bank (DNB) and the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM). ING Bank N.V. is incorporated in the Netherlands (Trade Register no. 33031431 Amsterdam).