Reports
10 June 2014

Special report: Cup-o-Nomics 2014

Part of the fun of the FIFA World Cup, held this year in Brazil, is supporting a team and trying to pick which nation will come out as the winner. But thinking traps can skew sporting as well as financial decisions. Read our special “cup-o-nomics” report for the 2014 football world cup to learn how.

Executive summary

When the FIFA World Cup 2014 kicks off on 12 June, 32 of the best football teams in the world will start vying for the title of being the best at the biggest sport in the world. But how much does the title mean to people in the competitors’ home countries? And which teams have an advantage?

If the “value” of all the players in a football team actually could decide the results of the World Cup, Spain would prevail this summer as our analysis shows its squad of 23 has the highest total market value at EUR675 million. Hosts Brazil are third and England seventh, boosted by the EUR49 million value of Manchester United forward Wayne Rooney.

An ING survey of about 8,000 people in 15 countries found Argentina and Chile are tied for top spot as the biggest “superfans”, followed by 2018 hosts Russia. Italy is the most fanatical of European countries surveyed. The United States is last. We used several measures to calculate nationalities’ passion for their team bringing home the cup, including willingness to sacrifice 1% of annual income for a year, the percentage of people who participate in a football pool, the average spend on supporter kit and more. Many fans like to show their support by dressing in the colours of their team. Russians and Argentinians top the survey results for spend per person on average on supporters kit, at EUR48. Expect to see plenty of red and gold on the streets of Moscow and white and sky blue in Buenos Aires. The figure in ING’s home of the Netherlands is only EUR5 per person but it adds to more than EUR70 million to be spent on Dutch supporters kit.

Playing with friends or colleagues to guess which team will win the World Cup – known as a pool – can increase the excitement of the tournament. Some even add in a wager to increase the stakes. 2010 champs Spain has the highest share of people who intend to participate in a World Cup pool, at 49%. The average wager ranges from highs of EUR83 in Russia and EUR80 in France down to EUR11 in the Netherlands. The Cup-onomics infographic gives six tips on limiting emotion and keeping a rational mind to help pick the tournament champ.

Chileans top the table on the measure of willingness to sacrifice a sum of money if it meant their team would win. They would be willing to give up EUR526 on average to see their team win. Adjusted for GDP to facilitate a like for like comparison, Argentina rises to the top. In fact, the willingness to sacrifice money for a football win in Argentina is more than five times the country’s research and development spend as a percentage of GDP. Italy spends 1.25% of GDP on research and development, according to the World Bank, lower than the 1.5% of GDP they are willing to sacrifice for a World Cup win.

This survey was commissioned by ING and conducted by TNS Nipo. In the Netherlands, there was an online survey among 1,067 respondents representative of the population based on age, gender and income. In all other countries, at least 500 respondents representative of the internet population in terms of age and gender were surveyed online.


Disclaimer

"THINK Outside" is a collection of specially commissioned content from third-party sources, such as economic think-tanks and academic institutions, that ING deems reliable and from non-research departments within ING. ING Bank N.V. ("ING") uses these sources to expand the range of opinions you can find on the THINK website. Some of these sources are not the property of or managed by ING, and therefore ING cannot always guarantee the correctness, completeness, actuality and quality of such sources, nor the availability at any given time of the data and information provided, and ING cannot accept any liability in this respect, insofar as this is permissible pursuant to the applicable laws and regulations.

This publication does not necessarily reflect the ING house view. This publication has been prepared solely for information purposes without regard to any particular user's investment objectives, financial situation, or means. The information in the publication is not an investment recommendation and it is not investment, legal or tax advice or an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell any financial instrument. Reasonable care has been taken to ensure that this publication is not untrue or misleading when published, but ING does not represent that it is accurate or complete. ING does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss arising from any use of this publication. Unless otherwise stated, any views, forecasts, or estimates are solely those of the author(s), as of the date of the publication and are subject to change without notice.

The distribution of this publication may be restricted by law or regulation in different jurisdictions and persons into whose possession this publication comes should inform themselves about, and observe, such restrictions.

Copyright and database rights protection exists in this report and it may not be reproduced, distributed or published by any person for any purpose without the prior express consent of ING. All rights are reserved.

ING Bank N.V. is authorised by the Dutch Central Bank and supervised by the European Central Bank (ECB), the Dutch Central Bank (DNB) and the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM). ING Bank N.V. is incorporated in the Netherlands (Trade Register no. 33031431 Amsterdam).