Why is the Fed selling its holdings of corporates?

The Federal Reserve built up a portfolio of corporates in response to Covid and early stresses in credit markets. They now plan to do an unwind. Not a taper, but outright selling. This was unexpected. It is not a signal on wider Treasury tapering, but it does push in that direction. It also adds some bonds back into a stressed money market that needs them badly

Opinions
3 June 2021
Corporate_bonds_US_030621_CREATIVE.jpg

The Fed’s decision to wind down its secondary market credit facility holdings is important for two reasons. First, it is a full blown reduction of credit holdings (not a mild taper, as the credit buying stopped at end-2020). Second, it is a change from the stand the Fed had implicitly taken (that they would hold the stuff to maturity).

From a wider market context, the volume isn't big – a little over USD5bn in bonds and USD8.5bn in ETFs (including high yield). This compares with some USD43bn in corporate bond average daily volume and an outstanding market capitalisation of over USD10trn.

When the Fed built up these positions they were not particularly aggressive, partly as the credit market had begun to heal in anticipation. The whole policy was more about sentiment than volumes (quite successfully so in fact). Moreover, the volumes bought really calmed after the initial burst of weekly volumes of some USD300m (and above) down to USD100m (and below), and then to close to nothing as we approached end-2020.

As the Fed exits, they will want to make it as uneventful as possible.

As the Fed exits, they will want to make it as uneventful as possible. There will be no ambition to affect the credit market adversely, partly as to do so would fly in the face of the ongoing Treasury bond buying programme which has a part objective to coax receivers of liquidity to buy further out the credit curve, supporting credit.

Selling some corporates will also add some collateral back to the market.

Selling some corporates will also add some collateral back to the market. These are not big volumes, and so the effect will be minor. But when there is in excess of USD400bn going back to the Fed through its reverse repo window there is clearly a lack of alternatives in the market place; every little helps.

Flows into and out of mutual funds in the past month

Source: EPFR Global, ING estimates
EPFR Global, ING estimates

This is effectively a tidying up exercise for the Fed, into a strong market for credit. Flow data shows very strong demand for front end paper, as can be gleaned from the graph above (centre section has corporates). The bulk of the cash inflows into corporates have been into shorter dated maturities.

The corporate bonds held by the Fed are generally short in maturity, with most maturing in the next two to four years. The average maturity is a little over two and a half years.

In terms of the Fed's holdings, the graph below has an illustration of the sector breakout, which shows broad-based holdings not dramatically deviant from wider market capitalistion weightings.

What the Fed holds in terms of corporates by sector (USDbn)

Source: Federal Reserve, ING estimates
Federal Reserve, ING estimates

In terms of quality breakout, the Fed's bond holdings are 40% single-A or better and just under 58% are BBB (remaining 2% is high yield); clearly investment grade, with a decent quality tilt. There should be no issue getting this paper back into the market in current circumstances.

If there were to be any hiccup here in terms of market stress of whatever description, it is our opinion that the Fed would hold off on being a seller for a period. There is no mad rush to get this trade done, and so it will only get done when it is conducive to do so.

And finally, there is no direct signal here for the bigger bond buying (QE) programme. The QE programme is part of the wider monetary policy setting, while the corporate buying programme was more a focused technical rescue. At the same time, it does push in the same direction as bigger picture tapering, as both are effectively policy unwinds. But all things considered, one does not have a direct signal for the other.

Padhraic Garvey, CFA

Padhraic Garvey, CFA

Regional Head of Research, Americas

Padhraic Garvey is the Regional Head of Research, Americas. He's based in New York. His brief spans both developed and emerging markets and he specialises in global rates and macro relative value. He worked for Cambridge Econometrics and ABN Amro before joining ING. He holds a Masters degree in Economics from University College Dublin and is a CFA charterholder.

Content Disclaimer
This publication has been prepared by ING solely for information purposes irrespective of a particular user's means, financial situation or investment objectives. The information does not constitute investment recommendation, and nor is it investment, legal or tax advice or an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell any financial instrument. Read more