What can France gain from a World Cup final?

France, at 1.1 billion euros the highest valued team at the World Cup, will play in the competition's final for the first time since 1988.  What might that do for the French economy? 

Opinions
13 July 2018
france_football_fans.jpg
French World Cup fans in Moscow, July 2017

20 years after the 1998 victory, “Les Bleus” are in a world cup final again. Hence the question, often asked, never fully answered: Just what could this bring to the French economy? While it might look ill-mannered to suggest there's a negative effect, it's not particularly easy to pinpoint a positive one either.

Even in 1998 when France actually hosted the World Cup, apart from some infrastructure investments, no aggregate positive effect on the economy appeared in the few serious studies subsequently published. It's interesting to note that other countries may benefit more, and this happens whoever is crowned the winner. Switzerland for example always registers a GDP jump (estimated to be 0.2pp for 1Q18 only) during large sporting events not least because Switzerland hosts the International Olympic Committee and UEFA which are paid billions in broadcasting rights. In France, the national TV channel TF1 will not contribute much to the service sector's GDP despite the record amount of viewers (with 19 million, the semi-final is already in the top 10 of most watched programmes in the last 30 years): the amounts transferred to Switzerland (65 million or half what it spent in 2014) are such that even a final does not guarantee a break-even.

Take a beer, enjoy the match, and don’t think about its effect on the economy

In terms of economic activity, the effects are difficult to establish. Of course, there are more supporters, consuming more beer and other hospitality-related services, at the same time affecting cinemas, theatres and restaurants. The same holds for sporting activities; the 1998 World Cup significantly increased the number of amateur players in France in the following years, almost as much as the 2010 debacle subsequently reduced. There will, therefore, be more activity in that sector in the coming years, compensated by less activity in other sports. In fact, one could even argue that in some cases, depending on the schedule of the matches in local time, a World Cup sometimes affects productivity at work, but it seems that this year in France the effect will be marginal as weekday matches were essentially in the late afternoon or the evening.

The only positive impact which can be registered relates to consumer confidence. In 1998, it was already on an increasing path. This year is different as consumer confidence was decreasing in the first half of the year despite an improving labour market. It could be that we see a rebound this summer that will help holiday spending.

President Macron could also benefit from this confidence sweet spot; in 1998, Jacques Chirac’s popularity increased by around 15 points on the back of the World Cup victory. However, it is unlikely to change the path of French growth for 2018: stronger activity is expected for the second half of the year whatever the final’s result, and it will have nothing to do with the world cup. This is, after all, all that should count. So take a beer, enjoy the match, and don’t think about its effect on the economy, there is none to be seen.


Disclaimer

"THINK Outside" is a collection of specially commissioned content from third-party sources, such as economic think-tanks and academic institutions, that ING deems reliable and from non-research departments within ING. ING Bank N.V. ("ING") uses these sources to expand the range of opinions you can find on the THINK website. Some of these sources are not the property of or managed by ING, and therefore ING cannot always guarantee the correctness, completeness, actuality and quality of such sources, nor the availability at any given time of the data and information provided, and ING cannot accept any liability in this respect, insofar as this is permissible pursuant to the applicable laws and regulations.

This publication does not necessarily reflect the ING house view. This publication has been prepared solely for information purposes without regard to any particular user's investment objectives, financial situation, or means. The information in the publication is not an investment recommendation and it is not investment, legal or tax advice or an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell any financial instrument. Reasonable care has been taken to ensure that this publication is not untrue or misleading when published, but ING does not represent that it is accurate or complete. ING does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss arising from any use of this publication. Unless otherwise stated, any views, forecasts, or estimates are solely those of the author(s), as of the date of the publication and are subject to change without notice.

The distribution of this publication may be restricted by law or regulation in different jurisdictions and persons into whose possession this publication comes should inform themselves about, and observe, such restrictions.

Copyright and database rights protection exists in this report and it may not be reproduced, distributed or published by any person for any purpose without the prior express consent of ING. All rights are reserved.

ING Bank N.V. is authorised by the Dutch Central Bank and supervised by the European Central Bank (ECB), the Dutch Central Bank (DNB) and the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM). ING Bank N.V. is incorporated in the Netherlands (Trade Register no. 33031431 Amsterdam).