Articles
24 April 2018

Puma Energy insulated from oil-price volatility

A well-run downstream oil company with a robust business model and a decent track record that we see no imminent signs of being disrupted 

240418-image-oil.jpg
Shutterstock

PUMA Energy was founded in 1997 and was established as an independent company after splitting out from the commodities trader Trafigura in 2007.

The unique business model involves building up retail, and B2B fuel distribution in emerging markets where market penetration is still comparatively low and demographic trends offer higher growth rates. Its strategy is focused on markets that lack storage and distribution infrastructure, where it can establish a leading market share and build regional hubs. In most of its markets, PUMA, therefore, benefits from economies of scale in supply. To ensure product supply into these countries, PUMA builds/acquires storage facilities for itself as well as renting them out to third parties. This vertical integration gives PUMA strong control over the whole supply chain.

PUMA's distribution and fuel retail activities are located in 49 countries, with a large proportion concentrated in emerging markets in Africa and Latin America. PUMA's is highly diversified across geographic regions, which reduces its dependency on any single country. Also, PUMA's role in developing and improving energy infrastructure and fuel supply reliability gives host governments a strong incentive to promote and maintain supportive regulatory regimes.

Business profile

Headquartered in Singapore, Puma Energy is a vertically integrated midstream and downstream oil group which stores, supplies and distributes refined oil products largely in emerging markets with revenues of $15.2bn in 2017.

The midstream segment, which accounts for 18% of $740mn EBITDA, mainly consists of storage facilities (also rented out to third parties), two refineries in Nicaragua and Papa New Guinea and transportation and marine mooring systems.

The vast majority of Puma Energy's storage capacity is used to support downstream business. The company owns and operates approximately 8.3m m3 of storage capacity. The downstream segment, which accounted for 82% of EBITDA, consists of distinct business lines including retail petrol stations, business-to-business (B2B), aviation, wholesale, bitumen, lubricants, bunkering and LPG, with retail and B2B business lines being the significant contributors to downstream segment profits. The company operates 3,064 retail service stations and serves 71 airports.

Ownership structure

PUMA is a privately owned company. The largest shareholder is Trafigura, a global commodities trader, which owns 49.49% of the firm. Sonangol, the state oil company of Angola, is the second largest shareholder with a 27.92% stake. Cochan Holdings LLC, which with PUMA has had a relationship since 2005, owns 15.45%. The balance is owned by private investors.

Source: Company data, ING
Company data, ING

FY17 earning summary

Puma posted FY17 results that were decent but, as expected, slightly weaker than the very high levels achieved in FY16. EBITDA declined 22% YoY to $740mn despite a 4% increase in sales volumes, as Downstream unit margins came under pressure early in the year before rebounding (overall flat YoY) and Midstream volumes fell 16% due to weak activity in Africa, though margins here rose 18% YoY.

Overall, the consequent fall in Downstream EBITDA of 3% to $607mn unsurprisingly overcame the 4% rise in Midstream EBITDA to $133mn. Looking at cashflows and the balance sheet, operating cash flows declined from $838mn to $477mn on the year due to an increase in working capital linked to the start-up of new activities, increased inventories and reduced payables.

However, PUMA reduced capex substantially from $561mn to $298mn (83% weighted towards organic growth). Cash from financing normalised to $89mn in FY17, reflecting drawings on loans as well as interest and dividend payments. The result was that cash on the balance sheet increased 54% YoY to $519mn, while leverage declined slightly to 2.7x (including inventories, without which it stands at 4.0x).

Source: Company data, ING
Company data, ING
  • Puma reported decent stable sales volumes in FY17 (+4% to 22.8mn m3), with growth strongest in Asia and the UK, while throughput declined 16% YoY to 16.6mn m3. Gross profit increased 4% to $1.7bn thanks to higher volumes and stable unit margins, while EBITDA declined 2% to $740mn as it was affected by additional personnel and rental costs as well as provisions for local taxes. Capex declined 47% YoY to $298mn while operating cash flows fell 43% to $477mn for reasons cited above. Capex remains fully financed by operating cash flows.
  • Looking across the segments, Downstream posted reasonable volume growth (+5% to 21.9mn m3) driven by retail, aviation and the UK business. Gross profit (+5% to $1.4bn) increased in line with volumes as unit margins remained stable, while EBITDA (-3% to $607mn) was impacted by higher opex. Meanwhile, Midstream showed reduced throughput volumes (-16% YoY), mainly in Africa. These were partially offset by an 18% increase in unit margins to $13/m3, meaning that gross profits were actually flat YoY at $227mn. More positively, EBITDA rose 4% to $133mn.
  • In terms of geographic segmentation, all areas posted growth in EBITDA except Europe and Africa, which saw a notable decline. However, the effect on free cash flow was cushioned by the sharp reduction in capex from $561mn in FY16 to $298mn in FY17. 57% of capex occurred in Africa and involved organic growth rather than acquisitions.
  • FY17 operating cash flows fell from $838mn in FY16 to $477mn as working capital increased due to the ramp-up of new activities and reduced payables. Investing cash flows of $359mn, which were fully financed by operating cash flows, declined from $733mn due to reduced capex and acquisition spending, while financing cashflows improved from ($14mn) to $99mn on loan drawings, interest payments and dividend payments.
  • Leverage improved slightly from 2.8x to 2.7x over the period (including inventories), during which PUMA refinanced $600mn of Senior Notes. We note that unsecured HoldCo debt now represents 87% of the Group’s debt, while 47% of PUMA’s debt matures in 2021 or beyond.

Given steady leverage, capex financed by operating cash and steady (though admittedly low) margins, we find Puma Energy attractive. Its unique business model gives it the necessary scale in its chosen markets and insulates it from the effects of oil-price volatility.


Disclaimer

"THINK Outside" is a collection of specially commissioned content from third-party sources, such as economic think-tanks and academic institutions, that ING deems reliable and from non-research departments within ING. ING Bank N.V. ("ING") uses these sources to expand the range of opinions you can find on the THINK website. Some of these sources are not the property of or managed by ING, and therefore ING cannot always guarantee the correctness, completeness, actuality and quality of such sources, nor the availability at any given time of the data and information provided, and ING cannot accept any liability in this respect, insofar as this is permissible pursuant to the applicable laws and regulations.

This publication does not necessarily reflect the ING house view. This publication has been prepared solely for information purposes without regard to any particular user's investment objectives, financial situation, or means. The information in the publication is not an investment recommendation and it is not investment, legal or tax advice or an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell any financial instrument. Reasonable care has been taken to ensure that this publication is not untrue or misleading when published, but ING does not represent that it is accurate or complete. ING does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss arising from any use of this publication. Unless otherwise stated, any views, forecasts, or estimates are solely those of the author(s), as of the date of the publication and are subject to change without notice.

The distribution of this publication may be restricted by law or regulation in different jurisdictions and persons into whose possession this publication comes should inform themselves about, and observe, such restrictions.

Copyright and database rights protection exists in this report and it may not be reproduced, distributed or published by any person for any purpose without the prior express consent of ING. All rights are reserved.

ING Bank N.V. is authorised by the Dutch Central Bank and supervised by the European Central Bank (ECB), the Dutch Central Bank (DNB) and the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM). ING Bank N.V. is incorporated in the Netherlands (Trade Register no. 33031431 Amsterdam).