Ian Bright: Beware of what you know
'Investing in what you know' is popular investment advice, but sometimes we succumb to unconscious routines and fall for thinking traps.
You think you know them
When you’re choosing investments, what companies stand out? More than half (57%) of investors prefer big-name, well-known brands when creating their portfolios, a UK-based poll by a prominent financial institution. On the face of it, this choice seems entirely natural. After all, the alternative may be buying shares in companies or ventures you know nothing about.
But how much do you usually really know about the bigger names? Perhaps we only think we know them because they are so high profile. Many good companies may not be well known. And familiarity with something isn’t the same as actually understanding it.
The familiarity bias trap
The tendency to go for a household name, in fact, might be little more than familiarity bias. This and other natural human habits of thought can mean missing out on potentially greater returns that may result from a different choice. For example, the Investec survey notes that investors are inclined to buy shares in banks. But how many truly understand how a bank is run?
Lack of diversification can be risky, arguably even imprudent
Aspects of overconfidence could be occurring here as well. Forty-seven percent of respondents said they wouldn’t even sell their stake if the shares performed poorly.
The disposition effect bias
They may be falling prey to the disposition effect, where people like to sell the winners but hold on to their losers. A reason may be natural reluctance to admit a mistake and take on board an actual financial loss. When a financial loss only seems to exist on paper, it can be easier to deal with.
The survey also finds that 31% - nearly a third – of investors keep holding shares that they originally bought as new listings on the market, and 21% hang onto shares they inherited from someone else.
Some aspects of mental accounting seem to be at work as well. If 11% of investors admit they hold shares because of the perks they can receive, they seem to be dividing the share price from the perk – considering them as separate “buckets” of value.
The home bias
Yet there are problems with buying only what you know purely from a finance perspective. Concentrating only on what you think you understand may mean your portfolio is insufficiently diverse – a risky strategy in itself. First, if investing only in one country, the tendency may be to unintentionally invest further away from a general market index (such as the UK’s FTSE).
Second, there may be unintended consequences from investing in your home country and not being open to opportunities in other countries. This is the “home bias” problem.
A lack of diversification can cause real problems if you tend to invest in what you understand but that tends to be the industry you work in as well. You end up with a double risk. If the industry you work in has a downturn and your income falls a lot (or you lose your job) the shares you own are likely to lose value at the same time.
If I remember correctly, this was a particular problem in the collapse of US energy giant Enron in 2001-2002, once a Wall Street darling. Many Enron staffers had much of their pension savings in Enron shares. Not only did they lose their jobs but they lost part of their pension pot.
It all depends on why you're investing
Having said all that, the whole idea of “invest in what you know” is not necessarily a bad idea. It depends on why you are investing. If you consider saving for your pension as investing, then “invest in what you know” is dangerous.
If you are trying to build long-term wealth for some other reason, the lack of diversification can be risky, arguably even imprudent (if you are, for example, a fund trustee). However, if investing is being done for fun, to dabble in the share market, perhaps, then have a good time! You might get a kick out of getting a dividend payment from that company you have admired for many years.
For more consumer economics articles, subscribe to our sister site eZonomic's newsletter here.
"THINK Outside" is a collection of specially commissioned content from third-party sources, such as economic think-tanks and academic institutions, that ING deems reliable and from non-research departments within ING. ING Bank N.V. ("ING") uses these sources to expand the range of opinions you can find on the THINK website. Some of these sources are not the property of or managed by ING, and therefore ING cannot always guarantee the correctness, completeness, actuality and quality of such sources, nor the availability at any given time of the data and information provided, and ING cannot accept any liability in this respect, insofar as this is permissible pursuant to the applicable laws and regulations.
This publication does not necessarily reflect the ING house view. This publication has been prepared solely for information purposes without regard to any particular user's investment objectives, financial situation, or means. The information in the publication is not an investment recommendation and it is not investment, legal or tax advice or an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell any financial instrument. Reasonable care has been taken to ensure that this publication is not untrue or misleading when published, but ING does not represent that it is accurate or complete. ING does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss arising from any use of this publication. Unless otherwise stated, any views, forecasts, or estimates are solely those of the author(s), as of the date of the publication and are subject to change without notice.
The distribution of this publication may be restricted by law or regulation in different jurisdictions and persons into whose possession this publication comes should inform themselves about, and observe, such restrictions.
Copyright and database rights protection exists in this report and it may not be reproduced, distributed or published by any person for any purpose without the prior express consent of ING. All rights are reserved.
ING Bank N.V. is authorised by the Dutch Central Bank and supervised by the European Central Bank (ECB), the Dutch Central Bank (DNB) and the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM). ING Bank N.V. is incorporated in the Netherlands (Trade Register no. 33031431 Amsterdam).