How the US election could impact the energy transition

The US has long been subject to material policy inconsistency through presidential election cycles. Most recently, the Biden administration reversed a series of Trump-era energy and climate policies, signed into law the landmark Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which has spurred $200bn of investment in clean energy manufacturing, strengthened regulations on several dirty economic activities, and is undergoing efforts to mandate climate data reporting.

Now, with the 2024 elections approaching and the recent confirmation of Kamala Harris as the presidential candidate for the Democrat Party, the US clean energy market is again subject to policy disruption.

As corporates and investors seek future resiliency for their business and investment decisions, it is important to understand what sections of the US clean energy policy may substantially change with the elections, and which may stay intact.

Regardless of who becomes president, the IRA is unlikely to be repealed and will continue to be a key piece of legislation facilitating the development of clean energy in the US. Meanwhile, onshoring key technologies and strengthening critical mineral supply chains will be a priority for both candidates. Streamlining permitting processes for energy projects will also have bipartisan support.

But there will still be differences in how Harris and Trump handle energy policymaking. We will unpack the policy differences in the four possible scenarios. In a nutshell, incentives for electric vehicles (EVs) and various clean energy loan programmes are at high risk of being scaled back under a Trump presidency, while incentives for technologies such as hydrogen and carbon capture and storage (CCS) would be less impacted. Renewable energy can get continued tax credits, though efforts toward grid modernisation would be weakened with Trump in the White House.

With most parts of the economy deploying clean technology right now, the US is undergoing a structural change where it is difficult to "cancel" the energy transition. But the big question is how much election cycles will affect the speed of the transition. Understanding the policy dynamics and underlying divers can help companies future-proof their businesses.